Would AZEC’s Decarbonization Efforts Lead to Increased Emissions Instead?

Keeping the global temperature increase below 1.5°C requires partnership and cooperation between countries. In this light, the Asian Zero Emission Community (AZEC) was established to facilitate cooperation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Asia, including Indonesia. However, a report by Zero Carbon Analytics reveals that this partnership can potentially increase greenhouse gas emissions in Indonesia instead of reducing it.

Japan-Indonesia Partnerships

AZEC is a cooperation platform pioneered by Japan to achieve carbon neutrality or zero emissions in Asia. The platform was officially launched in 2023 by 11 partner countries, including Indonesia. The country has been involved in the platform’s development as one of the initiators in 2022.

Japan and Indonesia have previously established a firm partnership and collaboration in the energy sector. For instance, Indonesia’s state-owned electricity company PLN has signed several Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs) with Japan. The purposes vary, from receiving funding assistance worth USD 500 million to partnering with Japanese banks and business communities.

Indonesia has signed 43% of the MoUs proposed in the AZEC initiative. However, an assessment from the international research institute Zero Carbon Analytics revealed that many of these agreements could extend fossil fuel use and increase greenhouse gas emissions, defeating their original purposes.

Potential Downside of AZEC Agreements

Of the 158 MoUs signed in AZEC, 56 are related to fossil fuel technologies, such as liquefied natural gas (LNG), ammonia, and carbon capture and storage (CCS). Indonesia agreed to 27 of those documents.

Through the AZEC partnership, Japan has poured millions of US dollars into developing LNG infrastructure in Southeast Asia, such as the Tangguh LNG Project in West Papua and the Abadi LNG in Masela, Maluku. However, the report highlights that converting natural gas into liquid can produce large amounts of methane, aggravating global warming.

Furthermore, the report also highlights the use of ammonia co-firing—burning ammonia and coal for power generation—which can be used as the basis for the government to continue operating steam-electric power plants (PLTU). Many Japanese companies have proposed initiatives to encourage ammonia co-firing in various power plants across the country, which have negatively impacted the health and wellbeing of the surrounding communities and their livelihoods, as well as produced large amounts of waste. Additionally, this practice is considered more expensive and has had multiple cases of failure so far, indicating that ammonia is not the most suitable option for decarbonization.

Meanwhile, CCS has also been widely seen to offer a ‘false solution’ due to its dubious effectiveness in reducing emissions. However, many agreements made under AZEC have been shown to support CCS projects, especially in the oil and gas sector.

Besides the report by Zero Carbon Analytics, the local civil society group WALHI also criticized the agreements for the use of technologies that support fossil fuels. WALHI also emphasized the non-transparent implementation of AZEC and the threats of land and sea grabbing, deforestation, environmental damage, and human rights violations in various projects agreed upon by Indonesia and Japan.

Partnerships for Just Energy Transition

Collaborative efforts between countries are indeed crucial to achieving net zero emissions. However, countries must ensure that these efforts are not performative and do not indicate greenwashing.

The government of Indonesia must rearrange the priorities in decarbonization policies so that both the energy sources and the technologies used are truly sustainable and are the best alternatives to stopping the use of fossil energy. Additionally, it is important to ensure the participation of Indigenous Peoples, local communities, and civil society groups to ensure just and inclusive energy transition efforts.

Editor: Abul Muamar & Nazalea Kusuma

Translator: Kresentia Madina

The original version of this article is published in Indonesian at Green Network Asia – Indonesia.

If you find this content useful, please consider subscribing to Green Network Asia
Your subscription will strengthen your personal and professional development with cross-sectoral insights on sustainability-related issues and sustainable development across the Asia Pacific and beyond, while supporting GNA’s financial capacity to continue publishing content dedicated to public education and multi-stakeholder advocacy efforts.

Select Your Subscription Plan